Over the last several years, I have noticed a trend in
social media among non-Christians. When
a tragedy occurs, they are quick to ridicule the common sentiment expressed
after such an act, “You are in our thoughts and prayers.” Why bother, they say. We don’t need thoughts and prayers, they say. We need action. We need something tangible. We need you to do more than just send good thoughts,
because none of your thoughts and prayers makes one iota of a difference in the
world today. Your prayers to a
non-existent or, at best, non-interested God didn’t change anything. The tragedy still occurred. The loss still took place. Hurt was felt, and evil was expressed
unchecked. So, why pray?
“Evidence collected over many years, obtained from
many locations, indicates that the power of Prayer is insufficient to stop
bullets from killing school children.” -- Neil deGrasse Tyson
The tweet above from Neil deGrasse Tyson in the wake of
the Parkland school shooting is just another example of these derisions of
prayer, although Tyson’s comment was wrapped in the guise of science. I respect Tyson as a scientist. I don’t agree with his world view, but I do
think Tyson has really advanced the case for scientific literacy in our world
today. I think he is influencing many
young men and women to consider careers in science, which can only result in
good things for the future.
However, I feel that Tyson does a disservice to both
religion and God with this assertion. The
essence of his point is that the Parkland school shooting is evidence that
prayer does not work. This is not good
science.
Scientists are painfully aware that the absence of
evidence is not evidence of absence.
What this means is that you can’t point to an example and say, “We didn’t
find X, so that means that it is not there.”
At best, you can point to your study and say, “We didn’t find X, so
there is an YY% chance that X does not exist or is not present.” And that’s with statistically rigorous
studies.
“The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”
Let me give you an example. During my master’s research for my wildlife
biology degree, I attempted to find evidence for the presence or absence of a
fox parasite in Georgia and South Carolina.
I spent two years trapping rodents and examining fox feces looking for
this parasite. I did not find any, despite
all my best efforts. So, that proves
that the parasite is not present, right?
No.
It simply means I did not find the parasite in my
sampling efforts. The absence of
evidence is not evidence of absence. All
I could say is that based on the number of samples I examined and the negative
results I found, there was an extremely high chance that this parasite was not
present in my study areas. Using the
scientific method could only lead me to say that I did not find the parasite in
my study, not that it wasn’t there and might not have shown up in my next
sample. Perhaps my study was set up
wrong. Perhaps I was trapping for the
wrong type of rodents. Perhaps the
rodents that carry this parasite weren’t in the areas I sampled. Perhaps the parasite has a life-stage that
made it impossible to find during the time period I sampled. There are too many factors to say
definitively, “This parasite does not exist in Georgia or South Carolina.” That
is the way science works.
Think about the many health-related studies you see in
the news. How many times have you seen
studies saying things like, “Saturated fat causes heart disease.” And then the next day, another study comes
out saying, “Saturated fat is not linked to heart disease.” Two studies, different results, who’s
right? We don’t know. The only thing each set of scientists can say
is “based on our study and the samples we examined, this is what we found.” No one can say with 100% certainty that their
study is correct and that saturated fat causes or doesn’t cause heart
disease.
So, what does this mean for us in the area of religion
and faith, specifically, in the area of prayer?
As I noted above, the absence of evidence is not evidence of
absence.
Does the fact that a school shooting occurred at the
Parkland High School in Florida definitively prove that prayer does not work,
as Neil deGrasse Tyson asserts? No, it doesn’t. Tyson cannot make that statement. He is wrong.
And, I am willing to bet, he knows it.
He was just trying to make a point in social media that fits his
personal world view about religion and prayer.
On the other hand, does the fact that only 1 out of 2,344
high schools in Florida had a school shooting on that day prove that prayer works? Following Tyson’s example, I could assert
that the fervent prayers of the saints prevented catastrophes and school shootings
at 2,343 schools in Florida on that day.
I could also assert that the impact of the shooting at Parkland was
lessened by God’s hand moving in response to prayer.
Does that mean I have evidence that prayer works because
none of these other 2,344 high schools experienced violence on that day? No, although the evidence of effectual prayer
would be stronger from a scientific point of view than the assertion that Tyson
makes based on one tragic result. But, I
can’t prove it scientifically. I can
only take it on faith.
My whole point is that science cannot prove or disprove
the efficacy of prayer or the existence of God through the scientific
method. That is outside the realm of
science, and Neil deGrasse Tyson does a disservice to both science and religion
by discounting the efficacy of prayer in such a flippant manner just to make a
personal point in a public forum.
So, if science cannot prove or disprove the effects of
prayer, does that mean that our “thoughts and prayers” are of no value? No. It
doesn’t. It comes down to a matter of
faith.
“[Jesus] said to them, ‘When you pray...’”
(Luke 11:2)
Without a doubt, God answers prayers. He answers them in ways that may not be
readily observable or testable through human perception or scientific
testing. But, God answers prayer. Not only is this evident in the biblical
record, it is evident and experienced in the lives of believers daily.
I have seen prayers answered in miraculous ways. And, I have seen them answered in ways that
some would say were coincidence or happen-stance. I have prayed for the healing of parishioners
in the hospital, not truly believing God would heal them in a physical way and
that they would ever leave that hospital bed, and then been surprised when they
walked through the door of the church on the next Sunday, praising God for
their healing. And, I have seen God
choose to heal people by taking them home to be with Him rather than healing
them physically as we had prayed.
I have seen God answer prayers by providing food and
resources to people who had lost all hope, leading disparate groups of people
to come together and meet their needs, all without coordination or planning or
discussion. I have seen God magnify
resources to minister to the homeless and to local communities in ways that
cannot be explained. I have seen God put
people together in order to have someone hear the gospel and be led to the
atoning cross of Christ.
Prayer works (better to say, “Prayer causes God to
intervene”). Prayer works, but it is a mystery. Prayer invokes the heart and presence of God
and demonstrates our faith and trust in His grace and benevolence. By offering our thoughts and prayers in the
midst of a tragedy, we are affirming that we believe God knows what the best
answer is and that we trust Him to work for the best in all situations (Romans
8:28).
But, we understand that the way God chooses to answer
prayer is not going to always be evident or provable by human senses. It is a matter of faith. It is a matter of knowing and believing and
acting on the promises of Scripture that God hears our prayers,
He knows our heart, and He moves in response to our cries
to Him. His answer may not be what we
want. His answer may be long in
coming. His answer may come in ways that
are miraculous, or in ways that can be explained away as coincidence. The point is God answers our prayers. Science cannot say otherwise. Neil deGrasse Tyson cannot say otherwise. The
absence of evidence does not prove that prayer works or doesn’t work. The proof of prayer is in the hearts of
believers.
“Pray without ceasing”
(1 Thessalonians 5:17)
So, please, continue to send your thoughts and prayers in
the face of tragedy. Continue to pray
for God’s hand to move -- for Him to intercede -- for Him to work in our lives
and in the midst of what we are going through.
Trust that God hears you and will answer you, whether you see evidence
of it or not. Because it is true. Scripture and experience affirm what science
cannot prove. Prayer works, and we know
this through faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment